V For Vendetta
Mar. 19th, 2006 08:59 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Alan Moore was wrong to disavow the film. It's oversimplified a bit (neccesary for the comic-to-film format) and it's a tad ham-fisted at the end, but really, "V For Vendetta" is really, really good, and more than 75% is lifted straight from the comics.
Yes, the lead character is a terrorist. Yes, he blows up buildings in London. But there's a lot of meat in there to chew on.
Yes, the lead character is a terrorist. Yes, he blows up buildings in London. But there's a lot of meat in there to chew on.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 02:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 11:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 02:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 03:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 02:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 11:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 02:48 am (UTC)Funny how society in about 20 years can change and not change.
No was outraged at the comic when bombs were going off in London all the time.
people are outrage someone made a movie where the terrorist is the good guy and there has been less bombings in London since the time it was writen .
why don;t those same people get outraged over movies like "the Patriot"... a terrorist fights the government, even take hostages to get what he and his fanatical band wants.
Smile.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 11:52 am (UTC)Here be spoilers
Date: 2006-03-20 04:48 am (UTC)I loved the change at the end. Such a visual. I would have liked the leaving in of the "he's inside the machine" thing. But the metaphor exchange is ok, IMO.
The changes in Evey's arc...I'm not sure. But the character felt a little scatter-shot to me, anyway (yeah, yeah, Alan Moore, I know. Combined with the Wachowski's, who aren't much better). I really liked the Deitrich thing, but I felt the absence of the refusal for (further) killing. Definitely a defendable call.
Re: Here be spoilers
Date: 2006-03-20 11:56 am (UTC)Re: Here be spoilers
Date: 2006-03-20 03:00 pm (UTC)Evey "becoming" V would have precluded the masks (the meta line was entertaining), which, I think, were a more powerful moment, and, I'm betting, the decision was made that "we all need to take responsibility for the rebuilding" was the message they wanted.
Re: Here be spoilers
Date: 2006-03-20 03:55 pm (UTC)Re: Here be spoilers
Date: 2006-03-20 09:08 pm (UTC)It is a trick to balance that with the idea of having to wait for a guy in a mask, a big hero, to save the day.
And I don't know how you get to 1) Everyone has to 2) Do something.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 05:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 11:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 06:13 am (UTC)Gotta say though...I was really wary of the end sequence...but it really caught the feel of the wonderful days of anarchy that V gives them all in the book...same concept.
Yeah. I had fun :-)
no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 11:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-24 02:33 am (UTC)On the whole, the spirit of the book was in the film and I didn't feel angry or cheated or robbed.
And I almost forgive the Wachowskis for wrecking their own franchise.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 02:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 03:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 05:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-20 08:30 pm (UTC)